Skip to main content

Table 1 Delphi ratings for the advocated quality indicators

From: Development of quality indicators for palliative care in intensive care units and pilot testing them via electronic medical record review

  

Round 3 (n = 16)

 

Round 5 (n = 16)

 
  

Validity

Feasibility

Validity

Feasibility

Indicators

Median

Agree

(%)*

Median

Agree

(%)*

Median

Agree

(%)*

Median

Agree

(%)*

Process

         

1

Regular pain assessment

8

81.3

7.5

75.0

8

87.5

8

87.5

2

Appropriate pain management

8

75.0

7

62.5

8

93.8

7

75.0

3

Reassessment of pain after treatment and/or management

8

81.3

6.5

50.0

8

87.5

8

81.3

4

Regular delirium assessment

8

75.0

8

81.3

8

87.5

8

87.5

5

Assessment of the patient's psychological distress

7

50.0

5

31.3

7

56.3

6

43.8

6

Assessment of public social support needs

8

81.3

7

68.8

7.5

93.8

7

81.3

7

Assessment of the patient's spiritual and cultural practices

7

56.3

5

25.0

7

68.8

5

37.5

8

Identification of the patient's advance directive and ACP for treatment

8

75.0

6

43.8

8

93.8

7

68.8

9

Conducting an interdisciplinary family conference on palliative care

7.5

81.3

7

68.8

8

93.8

8

81.3

10

Transmission of key information regarding palliative care following ICU transfer

8

81.3

7

56.3

8

93.8

7

62.5

11

Assessments of psychological distress of family members

8

87.5

7

68.8

8

93.8

7

81.3

12

Documentation of the medical process regarding end-of-life decisions

8

81.3

7

56.3

8

87.5

7.5

75.0

13

Modification of medical care for it to be in concordance with the goals of care for patients at the end of life

8

81.3

6

37.5

8

93.8

7

68.8

Outcome

         

14

Patient pain-free in the last 24 h of life

8

75.0

8

75.0

8

93.8

7.5

81.3

15

Avoid performing CPR when the patient does not want

8

68.8

8

75.0

8

87.5

8

81.3

Structure

         

16

Use of standardized pain measurement scales

9

100.0

      

17

Use of standardized dyspnea measurement scales

9

93.8

      

18

Use of standardized thirst measurement scales

8.5

100.0

      

19

End-of-life-specific symptom management care protocols or order sets

9

100.0

      

20

Access to a palliative care team when pain and other physical symptoms are difficult to control

9

100.0

      

21

Access to a specialized psychiatric team in presence of delirium, anxiety, or other difficult-to-control psychiatric symptoms

9

100.0

      

22

A policy that allows for flexible visitation opportunities in accordance with the family's wishes

9

93.8

      

23

Rooms with privacy for discussions between healthcare providers and family members

9

87.5

      

24

The system to provide mental health care to patients and their families

9

93.8

      

25

Leaflet for family members, including information on orientation to the ICU environment and delirium care

9

93.8

      

26

A "Critical Care Mediator for Inpatients" is in place

7

68.8

  

7

75.0

  

27

Regular opportunities for ICU staff to reflect on their end-of-life care experiences to support their emotional well-being

9

93.8

      

28

Access to palliative care specialists and other professionals to discuss ethical issues related to treatment

9

100.0

      
  1. *Agreement was defined as the percentage of panelists assigning nine-point Likert scale scores of 7, 8, or 9. ICU, intensive care unit; ACP, advance care planning; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation;