Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference of ventilation distribution related EIT-parameters of two levels in 50 critically ill patients

From: A novel method for diaphragm-based electrode belt position of electrical impedance tomography by ultrasound

Parameters

Diaphragm-based EIT-belt level

(n = 50)

5th ICS level

(n = 50)

Paired differences

95%CI of the difference

P-value

Glob-TVΔZ (au)

3082 ± 1103

2691 ± 1139

390 ± 560

231 to 549

 < 0.0001

TV/VT ratio

7.12 ± 3.0

6.21 ± 3.0

1.0 ± 1.4

0.6 to 1.4

 < 0.0001

ROI1 ΔZ (au)

365 ± 175

325 ± 171

39 ± 94

12 to 66

0.005

Percentage (%)

12 ± 5

12 ± 5

− 0.4 ± 2.7

− 1.2 to 3.6

0.291

ROI2 ΔZ (au)

1465 ± 541

1214 ± 500

250 ± 331

156 to 344

 < 0.0001

Percentage (%)

48 ± 8

46 ± 8

1.8 ± 4.3

0.6 to 3.0

0.05

ROI3 ΔZ (au)

1022 ± 496

948 ± 525

74 ± 197

18 to 130

0.01

Percentage (%)

33 ± 9

34 ± 9

− 1.6 ± 4.6

− 0.3 to 0

0.018

ROI4 ΔZ (au)

230 ± 124

203 ± 141

27 ± 59

10 to 44

0.002

Percentage (%)

7 ± 3

7 ± 3

0.1 ± 1.5

0 to 0.1

0.363

Upper right ΔZ (au)

877 ±  ± 383

791 ± 355

86 ± 237

19 to 154

0.013

Percentage (%)

29 ± 10

31 ± 12

− 2 to 6.5

− 4 to 0

0.027

Upper left ΔZ (au)

880 ± 424

692 ± 389

187 ± 242

118 to 256

 < 0.0001

Percentage (%)

28 ± 9

25 ± 10

3.0 ± 6.1

1.2 to 4.7

0.01

Lower right ΔZ (au)

642 ± 334

589 ± 347

53 ± 201

− 4 to 110

0.70

Percentage (%)

20 ± 8

21 ± 9

− 1 ± 5.6

− 3.0 to 0.5

0.174

Lower left ΔZ (au)

545 ± 329

518 ± 361

27 ± 143

− 14 to 68

0.191

Percentage (%)

17 ± 7

18 ± 8

− 1.1 to 5.1

− 2.6 to 0.3

0.122

  1. PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure, TV/VT tidal impedance variance/tidal volume, CI confidence interval